[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2014 23:42:54 -0500 |
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> the easy thing to do would be to always add an extra newline in front
> of the part marker, but that will cause an extraneous newline in most
> cases. the more clever thing to do would be to only add it if the
> previous part didn't end in a newline, but that's perhaps a bit hard,
> since the previous part was displayed by other code, far far away.
How about this following: The component that displays the part, appends
a LF only if there is no LF at end of part and if output is to a tty?
> how about this: when the last character of a text/plain part isn't a
> newline, append the contents of yet-another-mh-format-script, which by
> default would be a just a newline.
I raise the tty check since there could be scenarios where a part may be
validating (say cryptographically), and in such scenarios, the output of
the part would be going to a file or pipe and not directly to a terminal.
Could be a burden dealing with yet-another-mh-format-script when it
seems that the only time a LF should be appended is when dealing with a
tty.
--ewh
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Earl Hood, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Paul Fox, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues,
Earl Hood <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Paul Fox, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Earl Hood, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Paul Fox, 2014/05/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 2 little issues, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/05/21