[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:33:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Bill,
>
>> 9216 -03/25 ["d.henman" ] unexpected error mesage<<MH-E Version 8.3.1
>> Platform: Cygwin #1 T
>> 9217 03/25 [Zeus Panchenko ] Re: unexpected error mesage<<-----BEGIN
>> PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> ...
>
> I find that quite clutter-ful, with the []/<> being two characters to
> indicate one thing, and the identical subject repeated.
> http://www.davep.org/mutt/screenshots/index.png is an example of mutt's
> presentation. (Like Ken, I liked trn's little context tree when viewing
> a single Usenet article.)
I can't argue with you about the []/<> characters. As a user, I don't
really care about the subtle difference between them. I think Satyaki
(who implemented it) did.
Gnus also repeats the subjects, but collapses threads into a single line
followed by an ellipsis until you start reading the first message.
How does the Mutt presentation handle the Subject: New subject (was: old
subject) case?
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
- [Nmh-workers] Threads, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, norm, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads,
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Eric Gillespie, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, epg, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Eric Gillespie, 2013/04/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/06