[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:00:52 -0500 |
>Not when you have things like -Wa,foo, the -X family, and the like.
>I've always maintained a distinction between CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, using
>the latter exclusively during the linking step. It just seems cleaner
>to me to do it that way.
Well, let me ask this ... is it actually a problem? Or just a stylistic
issue? I ask because I'm reluctant to change the default LINK rules
that Automake sets up. Ok, fine ... you're free to use this as another
reason to hate Automake :-)
(I have been meaning to switch us over to using AM_CFLAGS instead of
CFLAGS in configure.ac, but that's a whole other issue :-/)
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Dodgy $LINK in generated Makefile, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/02