[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts on 1.5 release candidates
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts on 1.5 release candidates |
Date: |
Wed, 09 May 2012 22:25:00 -0400 |
ken wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I think this time around we've gotten some more traction on this release;
> we've even got people upgrading from 1.0 (!) and on what sounds to be
> rather ancient hardware. As always, it turns out Paul Vixie was right ...
> a longer release cycle this time is definitely a good thing.
>
> So, I'm wondering ... what do people think so far of 1.5-RC2? Have you
> tried it? If so, are you happy with it? If you haven't ... how come?
> No judgement here, I'm trying to figure out what would make it easier
> for you to try it out.
>
> Any other comments, good or bad, are welcome.
so far so good.
one nit: when configured with sendmail rather than smtp (i used
the docs/contrib/build_nmh script to do this, so i can't quote what
that did under the covers), the "make check" step fails. all of
(well, most of ) the test-post-* scripts fail because they set up
a local fakesmtp program using -server 127.0.0.1 and -port BIGNUM,
and presumably send fails to connect to it due to the config.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 54.7 degrees)