[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Jerry Peek |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:02:58 -0700 |
On 22 December 2005 at 12:10, Paul Fox <address@hidden> wrote:
> i want to isolate the thread, and then be able to prev and next
> through it. so i think your method might be okay, if there were
> a "-seq" option to prev and next, which meant "next in sequence".
I'm not following all of this threading discussion completely
(lots of other work to do this morning, and the email's flying!).
But can't this already be done with plain old:
show seqname:next
show seqname:prev
?? For example:
$ pick -subj whatever -seq picked
$ refile picked:last +somefolder
$ show picked:first
$ rmm
$ show picked:next
$ ...
Jerry
- [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, pmaydell, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Harald Geyer, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0,
Jerry Peek <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Chad Walstrom, 2005/12/22