[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1-rc2
From: |
Glenn Burkhardt |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.1-rc2 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:30:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Please check to see if they haven't been committed already to the CVS archive.
The problem with the generation of RC2 was that it wasn't a snapshot of the
latest source in the CVS archive; it was a branch or private un-updated copy.
I'll try to check, too.
On Monday 29 September 2003 10:14 pm, you wrote:
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:30:27 -0400
> From: Glenn Burkhardt <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>
> | We hope to have RC3 posted soon. ;-)
>
> In RC2 I noticed that a couple of fixes from a year ago haven't
> been included, could they go in RC3 as well ?
>
> The main one is a core dump in sortm - I sent a patch for that to the
> list in October last year - look for
> Message-id: <address@hidden>
> (Oct 15, Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug #1393] sortm core dumps)
>
>
> There was another patch (to scan.c) the next day from Anders Eriksson,
> I'm not sure if that one got included or not (message in same thread).
>
> Then Oct 25 (Message-id: <address@hidden>) (again,
> same Subject) I sent another patch, for "pick" this time, that isn't
> really a bug fix, but a minor enhancement (though it can also be seen
> as a bug fix).
>
> If those patches aren't easily found, I can forward them. It would be
> a good idea to scan the list archives (assuming they exist somewhere) and
> see what other fixes haven't been included yet. Try to get 1.1 to
> include everything that is known.
>
> kre