[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it
|
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:58:29 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 |
Op 25-04-2023 om 16:50 schreef Gur Telem:
Apple can't use nano because it's licensed as GPLv3 [...]
What problem does Apple have with version 3 of the GPL?
If possible to make nano with less restrictive license [...]
The GPL is _restrictive_? How? What does the GPL forbid that
Apple wants to do?
Anyway, most of nano is copyrighted by the FSF. Good luck trying
to convince them to offer it under a different license. :) Some
parts of nano are copyrighted by me. And there's no chance you'll
convince me of offering them under a different license.
Benno
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, (continued)
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, akierig, 2023/04/28
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, Chris Allegretta, 2023/04/28
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, akierig, 2023/04/28
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, Benno Schulenberg, 2023/04/29
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, Gur Telem, 2023/04/29
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, Deane Blazie, 2023/04/28
- Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, Benno Schulenberg, 2023/04/29
Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it, akierig, 2023/04/25
Re: Please release nano under less restrictive license so we can use it,
Benno Schulenberg <=