|
From: | Rocco Corsi |
Subject: | Re: [Nano-devel] 1.0.8 Memory leaks . . . and fixes |
Date: | Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:08:48 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901 |
Chris Allegretta wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:50:29PM -0500, Rocco Corsi wrote:For 1.1 YES. For 1.0 that is up to you, but I think it should be applied.Hi Rocco, Committed and credited in both trees. Can you take a look at how the 1.0 tree looks though; since the diff didn't apply properly I sort of shoved it in there by hand. I also had to change the charalloc call to an nmalloc * sizeof(char *). I hope it will work without the memory being initialized. Please let me know if not.
Change for nmalloc() instead of charalloc() should be OK. I did tests at one point if the buffer had garbage and it was fine.
I just compiled 1.0 and tested it. It looks good. Rocco
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |