[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev change to status line
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev change to status line |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:22:13 -0700 |
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 01:06:13AM -0500, Klaus Weide wrote:
>
> ...
> You see, I don't really know... I'd just prefer to have a choice
> until I'm convinced.
>
> Klaus
>
A *run-time* choice!
So we can each of us try it a bunch of times both ways, and
then settle on what we like.
I agree that "..." might be ambiguous. How about "<SNIP>" or
some such? Or "{SNIP}", or via other chars usually NOT in
a url.
Best if lynx barfs on those chars if we cut-n-paste the ... version
for a goto-link, so we know instantly we've screwed up.
David
- lynx-dev code indentation style (was "JUSTIFY") - warning, "religious" topic..., (continued)
- lynx-dev code indentation style (was "JUSTIFY") - warning, "religious" topic..., Klaus Weide, 1999/07/14
- lynx-dev change to status line, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/14
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/07/15
- lynx-dev javascript jump (was: change to status line), Heather Stern, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev javascript jump (was: change to status line), David Woolley, 1999/07/17
- Re: lynx-dev javascript jump (was: change to status line), Heather Stern, 1999/07/17
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev change to status line,
David Combs <=
- Re: lynx-dev patch, David Woolley, 1999/07/18
Re: lynx-dev patch, David Woolley, 1999/07/13
Re: lynx-dev patch, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/12
Re: lynx-dev patch, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/12
Re: lynx-dev patch, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/12
Re: lynx-dev patch, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/12