[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15
From: |
pg |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 1999 07:26:10 -0700 (MST) |
In a recent note, address@hidden said:
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:05:05 -0800 (PST)
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> Mitigate this by only adding lines if the previous line was non-empty.
> >> Then if I had 3 lines filled of a 10-line textarea,
> >> I wouldn't end up adding any lines;
> >> and if I had 10 of 10 filled, I'd add 1 blank line, then move on.
> >
> >surely that's the solution: Return calls up a further input line
> >only if you've already written something on the last existing line.
>
> Not quite. I can see someone wanting to leave a blank line between
> paragraphs.
>
And I frequently run Lynx in an XTerm window, and cut-and-paste from other
windows. I'd hate to have a strategically misplaced blank line blow me
out of the text area I intended to extend, and blast the remaining text
into further text fields (even likely interpreted as commands).
Use <TAB> or ^V<CR> to advance to the next field; I'd welcome this change
in user interface in exchange for the capability to extend text fields.
-- gil
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15, Larry W. Virden, 1999/01/29
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15, Bela Lubkin, 1999/01/28
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15, Henry Nelson, 1999/01/28
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.15, David Combs, 1999/01/29