[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:20:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114 |
On 2/8/19, 10:17 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of address@hidden"
<address@hidden on behalf of address@hidden> wrote:
On 2019/02/08 17:05:46, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 2019/02/08 16:41:06, dak wrote:
> > For what?
> Since you’re complaining about LilyPond-specific functions not handled
by Guile,
> what about assoc-get? From what I gather, this remains entirely bound
to our
> codebase?
And I plan to at one time let it deal with more than just pairs in a
list, also allowing hashtables as members (and likely tails) and likely
vectors.
So it's actually good if it is under our control.
Also, IIRC, assoc-get works to get values out of alist-chains, not just out of
plain alists.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), dak, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), dak, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden), dak, 2019/02/08
- Re: Dedicated functions for negative predicate tests (issue 345190043 by address@hidden),
Carl Sorensen <=