[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Link Time Optimization
From: |
Nick Bowler |
Subject: |
Re: Link Time Optimization |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:55:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On 2010-08-25 06:40 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> What would be nice about the autotools ML is having, in the subject,
> the name of the project > in bracket:
>
> Subject: [libtool] ****
>
> That can be done automatically (a configuration option in mailman, I
> guess). That would make me more aware of something important to read.
Please, no mangling of e-mail subjects. All pain, no gain. See
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
for details. Everything sent by this mailing list has the header:
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
which can be used to filter mails from the list. For example, I use the
following procmail recipe:
:0
* ^X-BeenThere:address@hidden
libtool/
which puts all the mails from this list into the 'libtool' mailbox.
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
- Re: Link Time Optimization, (continued)
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, David, 2010/08/24
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/25
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/25
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/25
- Re: Link Time Optimization,
Nick Bowler <=
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/08/25
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/08/26
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Werner Koch, 2010/08/25
- Re: Link Time Optimization, Vincent Torri, 2010/08/25