[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:54:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:40:18AM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?,...:
>
> > If so, shouldn't
> >lib-link be producing that as deplib instead? I.e., aspell should be
> >using the value of LTLIBINTL instead, I believe.
>
> I did notice that LTLIBINTL was correct (i.e. used -L/local/gnu/lib -lintl
> instead of /local/gnu/lib/libintl.so) but that's not what aspell was
> using (it's using LIBINTL).
Seems like an easier fix to use LTLIBINTL than my patch :) Tim, want
to submit a patch to the aspell folks?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, (continued)
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/09
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Albert Chin, 2005/10/10
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/10
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/12
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/12
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/10/13
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Tim Mooney, 2005/10/13
- Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?, Albert Chin, 2005/10/12