[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:31:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:19:13PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:20:01PM CET:
> >>>>>"Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> Bob> What I have now learned the hard way is that aclocal ignores the
> >> Bob> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) definition in configure.ac.
> >>
> >>IMHO it's a bug in whatever let you think aclocal would honor
> >>AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR to way you thought. It certainly isn't the
> >>Automake manual.
> >>
> >>See also
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00097.html
> >
> >
> > Gary, can we revert libtool--release--2.0--patch-67 or fix it?
> > This is a major pain for people when testing branch-2-0.
>
> The automake-1.4 compatibility patch? Why, what is wrong with it?
Brother. I meant libtool--release--2.0--patch-68.
Where's the coffee?
Sorry for the noise,
Ralf
- Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/20
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/20
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/20
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/11/21
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/22