[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: TODO |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:48:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:29:37PM CET:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:46:09PM CET:
> > I just want to get some possibilities out there into the ether. Feel free
> > to add more bits/say which bits are silly.
>
> branch 2.0:
>
> I would like to see one arch which has no dynamic linking but still
> passes the relevant libltdl preopen tests. Anyone?
Decide whether we also allocate the slist* prefix in libltdl;
document the resulting namespace requirements or wrap under lt_*.
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: TODO, (continued)
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/09
- Re: TODO, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/09
Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/09
Re: TODO,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/10
Re: TODO, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/11/09
Re: TODO, Noah Misch, 2004/11/10