I have observed that, even after calling jit_destroy_context(), some memory objects do not get freed by libjit. Is it a memory leak bug in libJIT, or is it just that jit_destroy_context() isn't sufficient to deallocate all memory?
Thanks
Aritz Erkiaga
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
[Libjit] How to avoid a memory leak,
Aritz Erkiaga<=