[Bug libstdc++/14493] No std::bad_alloc::what() const

[gdr at integrable-solutions dot net]

------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  
2004-03-11 10:05 -------
Subject: Re:  No std::bad_alloc::what() const

"pme at gcc dot gnu dot org" <address@hidden> writes:

| >  Especially compared to "bad allocation"?
| 
| Sure, we could change that.  I don't think "bad allocation" is any
| better than the demangled type name, but we shouldn't be printing
| a mangled typeid.  Others felt differently.

I agree with Phil that we should not have been printing the mangled
typeid.

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493