Re: [External] : forward-sexp

[Emanuel Berg]

Drew Adams wrote:

>>> As I said, it all depends on how `forward-sexp' is defined
>>> [...]
>> 
>> Actually the OP is right, we should have everything Lisp
>> work everywhere else as well, and it should always
>> make sense.
>
> Right about what? The notion of a sexp, just like the notion
> of a word, depends on the context. That's a feature, not
> a bug.

Indeed, it would be allowed to do different things based
on context.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal