Re: [External] : Re: ;;;###autoload declarations

[Emanuel Berg]

Drew Adams wrote:

>> However, what I can see it fails to address why this is at
>> all desirable to do and, assuming it is, in what cases more
>> precisely it is useful.
>
> If you never use anything from some library then it isn't
> loaded. That's the idea: load code only if and when you need
> it [..]

So it isn't loaded automatically, it is loaded when needed?

Is that the same as just-in-time or lazy evaluation?

Maybe just different context/points of emphasis ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal