[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:39:04 +0200 |
> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 21:15:00 +0100
>
> How can I natively compile _all_ Elisp, my own from the
> Makefile when byte-compiling, and all other Elisp just once
> and for all since I don't change that? (By all means, the
> after change-thing don't have to be disabled or anything as
> those method are not contradictory, on the ... contrary.)
You could look at how this is done when Emacs is built from the
release tarball, and do something similar.
But if you think you can do that only once, you are mistaken:
basically, each time you want your Lisp to work with a new version of
Emacs, you need to recompile your Lisp into *.eln files anew.
- stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/14
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Chen Zhaoyang, 2023/02/15
- full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/15
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Jean Louis, 2023/02/16
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/16
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Jean Louis, 2023/02/17
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/18
- Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Madhu, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp, Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/21
- Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp), Emanuel Berg, 2023/02/23