[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Configuration files vs customization
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: Configuration files vs customization |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:40:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.16; emacs 30.0.50 |
Dr Rainer Woitok <rainer.woitok@gmail.com> writes:
Hi Rainer,
> in the course of my transition from XEmacs to Emacs I meanwhile have
> reached the point of getting Vm running under Emacs. But my first at-
> tempt utterly failed. After some experimenting and checking variable
> values with "C-h v" I came to the conclusion that at least in some
> vari- ables' descriptions the remark "You can customize this variable"
> really meant "You HAVE TO customize this variable".
As Drew already pointed out, defcustom has several properties like :set
which might do stuff when the variable is customized and which are not
executed when it's only set with `setq'. In very recent Emacsen (29+),
there's `setopt' which has the syntax of `setq' but behaves more like
`custom-set-variables'.
Bye,
Tassilo
- Configuration files vs customization, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2023/01/21
- Re: Configuration files vs customization, Jude DaShiell, 2023/01/21
- Re: Configuration files vs customization, Thibaut Verron, 2023/01/21
- RE: [External] : Configuration files vs customization, Drew Adams, 2023/01/21
- Re: Configuration files vs customization,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: Configuration files vs customization, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: Configuration files vs customization, Eduardo Ochs, 2023/01/21