[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Special hilighting for comments
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Special hilighting for comments |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2022 08:24:22 +0100 |
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 06:59:32AM +0000, Heime wrote:
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Sunday, December 11th, 2022 at 6:54 AM, tomas@tuxteam.de
> <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 02:37:38AM +0000, Heime wrote:
> >
> > > Would you know the problem with the following regexp
> > >
> > > "^;; \\[.+\\].*$"
> > >
> > > It fails to match
> > >
> > > ;; [something] other things
> >
> >
> > Worksforme. At least if the first semicolon is actually at the
> > start of a line, that is.
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > t
>
> Yes it works. I am trying to use subexp in highlight-regexp.
> To match "^;; \\[.+\\].*$" but highlight only the "\\[.+\\]" part.
Aha. Read again the documentation string of `hightlight-regexp'.
Is there any part in there you don't understand? What about
SUBEXP?
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, (continued)
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Jean Louis, 2022/12/10
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/10
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/10
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Jean Louis, 2022/12/10
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Jean Louis, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, tomas, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments,
tomas <=
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, tomas, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, Heime, 2022/12/11
- Re: Special hilighting for comments, tomas, 2022/12/11