[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m question
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m question |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 01:45:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Yuri Khan [2022-11-07 13:08:44] wrote:
> After re-reading RFC 9110 § 12.5.3, it looks like the client should
> indicate its supported and preferred content encodings in an
> Accept-Encoding request header. Does w3m.el send one? If it doesn’t,
> the server may assume any encoding is acceptable.
Really? That doesn't sound right. Shouldn't the server assume that
only the simplest encodings can be used if the header is missing?
That's the only safe choice, no?
Stefan
- Re: emacs-w3m question, (continued)
Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/06
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/08
Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/02