[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lamers on IRC
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: lamers on IRC |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2022 17:12:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> IRC is good as Emacs has direct access to it with its irc and erc
> ^
> rcirc
>
>> packages and maybe others.
> ^
> https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/InternetRelayChat#h5o-1
Is it too much of a good thing?
Or is too much of a good thing - a good thing?
No, it's good that there are many ...
Proliferation/multitude/plethora/ubiqutious ... that's just
fancy ways of saying it!
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: lamers on IRC, (continued)
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/23
- Re: lamers on IRC, Jean Louis, 2022/05/25
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/25
- Re: lamers on IRC, Samuel Wales, 2022/05/25
- Re: lamers on IRC, Samuel Wales, 2022/05/25
- Re: lamers on IRC, Samuel Banya, 2022/05/25
- Re: lamers on IRC, Jean Louis, 2022/05/26
- Re: lamers on IRC, Jean Louis, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: lamers on IRC, Jean Louis, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Samuel Banya, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28