[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs is stable software
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs is stable software |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2021 11:03:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:14:47AM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
> <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> [2021-05-04 11:08]:
[...]
> > Okay, but why are you people using such old Emacs?
>
> Maybe for you is "old" but even that some version is older does not
> need to be known to user.
All nice and well, but whoever does that pays a price for it: keep
your old docs around, read them yourself instead of expecting others,
like this mailing list, Stack Overflow or the general Internet to
read them for you -- because the older your version the higher the
probability they are looking at other version's docs.
And, oh, make your version explicit, especially if it's a bit
"different".
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/03
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Joost Kremers, 2021/05/04
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Christopher Dimech, 2021/05/05
- Re: setq-local: Wrong number of arguments, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/05