[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:01:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2019-07-31, at 11:09, Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>> How about ISO 8601?
>
> Yep, one of my favorite ISOs OAT, also the one
> and only one ISO mentioned in the date(1) man
> page.
>
> They also mention RFC 2822 and RFC 3339 tho,
> and of them three, I think I'd vote for 3339:
>
> 2006-08-14 02:34:56-06:00
Thanks, I didn't know those!
>> Also, why would the same timestamp for a few
>> entries be a problem? The problem I'd like to
>> solve is "I did something strange 10 seconds
>> ago, I want to know what I did, I'm not
>> interested in stuff that happened 4 or 40
>> seconds ago".
>>
>> IOW, even better format could be
>> "2019-07-31T07:40:04+00:00 (18 seconds ago)"
>
> Hm, I wonder what the "T" is... time?
I guess so. This is probably the dumbest part of ISO 8601.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
- improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31