[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:31:36 +0300 |
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
>
> > I think it's just a bug: when left-word and right-word were introduced
> > only one pair of bindings was updated and not the other.
>
> I'm not sure it's a bug. My guess is that it was by design
> (for whatever reason). Perhaps Eli or someone else can
> enlighten us.
>
> I kinda doubt it was an oversight. All of those bindings
> are together, and the person who changed the Meta bindings
> likely searched for `forward-word', not "[M-right]" or
> "(kbd "M-<right>")"...
I don't remember why I bypassed ESC <right> etc. Maybe I wanted to
change as few bindings as possible. Maybe I thought users of R2L
script are unlikely to invoke these commands via ESC. Maybe I just
made a mistake.
If someone is annoyed by the difference (which should only be visible
in bidirectional text), feel free to make ESC do the same as Meta in
this case.
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, (continued)
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Stefan Monnier, 2018/04/11
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/11
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- RE: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Drew Adams, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Robert Pluim, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Yuri Khan, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/12
- Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/10
Message not available