[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:29:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2018-04-09, at 22:58, Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com> wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>> You clearly do not have a lot of experience
>> publishing in scientific journals, do you?
>
> It doesn't matter what journal or publication,
> scientific or not, it happens.
>
> But no. The only science I do is the sweet
> science. But even there, there are a lot of
> mistakes, even at the very top level :)
So let me tell you that while I'm not a prolific author with respect to
journal papers, I can attest to this: not only copyediting in the
TUGboat is superb, but (contrary to most scientific journals I published
my papers in) it is _existent_ at all.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
- RE: (interactive) call or form?, (continued)
- RE: (interactive) call or form?, Drew Adams, 2018/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/04/09
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/09
Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08