[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: try-this-for ?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: try-this-for ? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:11:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
> POSIX
If you didn't know it, "Portable Operating
System Interface", ~1985. The X is for Unix and
the acronym was suggested by Richard Stallman.
The former designation was IEEE-IX so no wonder
they dropped it :)
One has to wonder about the "P" tho as it seems
portability is sort of the reason for any
standard - if it isn't portable, it isn't
a standard but a manual, right?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- try-this-for ?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: try-this-for ?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/18
- Re: try-this-for ?, tomas, 2018/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: try-this-for ?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/18
- Re: try-this-for ?, tomas, 2018/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: try-this-for ?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/19
- Re: try-this-for ?, tomas, 2018/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: try-this-for ?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/19