Re: cl-dolist, dolist, cl-return,

[Stefan Monnier]

> But I'm not using nth - probably you misread "neq".

No, I'm talking about the code used internally by dolist.  If the list
over which we iterate were re-computed each time, then to find the "next"
element, we'd need to use nth at each iteration.

IOW it's a different problem from the re-computation of array bounds at
each iteration (which would be inefficient in itself but wouldn't impose
additional inefficiencies on the rest of the loop).


        Stefan