Re: What does "lacks a prefix" mean?

[Rusi]

On Friday, July 10, 2015 at 4:00:18 AM UTC+5:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Rusi writes:
> 
> > Ive sometimes wished for a let-variant that does the
> > duty of both let and let* eg.
> 
> > (let (((x 1) (y 2))
> >       ((z (foo x y))))
> >   body...)
> >
> > This kind of let would cost one paren more than the usual let.
> > But could make dependencies explicit without
> > overspecifying
> 
> let* already does what let does.

*** Welcome to IELM ***  Type (describe-mode) for help.
ELISP> (setq a 'a b 'b)
b
ELISP> (let ((a b)(b a)) (list a b))
(b a)

ELISP> (let* ((a b)(b a)) (list a b))
(b b)