[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Check for redundancy
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Check for redundancy |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:25:40 +0200 |
On 2015-06-26, at 17:01, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> wrote:
> Hungarian notation is a joke. [...]
I would bet that you've never done anything in LaTeX3, have you?
I agree that for high-level, general-purpose languages, HN is rarely
a good idea. (Though some variants, like consistent naming schemes -
like Emacs' convention for variables ending in ‘-function’ or ‘-hook’ -
are fine, aren’t they?)
For a fairly low-level thing like TeX, in which the same thing can be
represented in a few ways (like “\foo” versus “foo”, which is a bit like
the symbol/string difference in Lisp), you would perish without it.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- RE: Check for redundancy, Drew Adams, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/25
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Yuri Khan, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28