[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:03:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ken Goldman <kgoldman@us.ibm.com> writes:
> As someone who uses keyboard macros constantly ...
>
> I think they're certainly faster to write than lisp,
> since there's no debug time.
>
> For some specialized task I'll probably never use
> again, I can probably write the macro with less
> keystrokes than calling up .emacs and typing in
> the elisp.
>
> For the rare times I think I'll need the command
> again, I assign it to a key chord or save it.
What do you typically produce with your macros? If you
give me a good example where the macro is the life
saver, I can think how I would do the same thing.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Ken Goldman, 2015/06/25
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Ken Goldman, 2015/06/25
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/26
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, MBR, 2015/06/27
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/06/27
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/28
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/28
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/06/26