[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Control-C conundrum
From: |
Rusi |
Subject: |
Re: Control-C conundrum |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jun 2015 21:22:41 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 10:17:48 AM UTC+5:30, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tim Johnson wrote:
> > I've done extensive keybinding based on the recommendations here:
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Key-Binding-Conventions.html
>
> Those are the rules for people producing code for other people to
> use. These are packages and modes distributed with emacs and as 3rd
> party resources to emacs. If you wrote a new mode and wanted to
> distribute the sources for other people to use then you should follow
> those rules so that other people will be able to interact with them.
>
> > I'm aware that major or minor modes may use C-l or C-o, but I don't
> > have any of the thumb pain when I use either C-l or C-o.
>
> If you are making your own keybindings for your own use then you are
> free to do anything you wish. Including violate those rules for your
> own purposes. Those key binding conventions don't apply to the end
> user. I say do whatever you feel is best for you. Pain does not grow
> character. Pain is painful.
OT for emacs but hopefully not for your situation
https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arora/RSI.html
- Re: Control-C conundrum, (continued)
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Tim Johnson, 2015/06/04
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Tim Johnson, 2015/06/04
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Bob Proulx, 2015/06/06
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Tim Johnson, 2015/06/10
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Haines Brown, 2015/06/11
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Tim Johnson, 2015/06/11
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Bob Proulx, 2015/06/12
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: Control-C conundrum, Joe Fineman, 2015/06/11
Message not available
Re: Control-C conundrum, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/03