[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jun 2014 01:03:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah I had a friend who staunchly believed that using
> ed would clarify the thoughts and purify the soul.
If you don't mind (no pun intended), why not put a
little more effort on sensible quotes? (Look above.)
[Actually I had to remove it, Gnus wouldn't let me send
it.]
But, the whole clarification of thoughts and
purification of the (analytic) soul is something I
have spent years on now. I'm pretty sure this can be
achieved with Emacs, you don't have to dig deeper than
that. Or you can keep that digging to Emacs, its
enough, perhaps I should say...
But one aspect that isn't mentioned that often is that
it works both ways. A couple of years ago, I could do
Windows and MS Access or whatever at day, and then get
a quick fix of much-needed oxygen at night with the
sweet Linux shell and Emacs. Now I refuse to do that,
it is actually painful mentally and physically. When I
see a programmer operate such a program, clicking on
everything and all that, sticking his head into the
monitor on the laptop (on the table) with a minimal
keyboard, I have to remind myself he is actually doing
sensible work - because to me it looks like it is some
show at the zoo or circus. Ha-ha, no joke, it is
lonesome at the top... :)
> I sometimes get the feel that we emacs users look
> like analogous cartoons to the current generation.
Yes, it would be very, very interesting to know how
those guys think about software and tools! I only know
how I think - good question, how do they think?!
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RTF for emacs, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- Re: editor and word processor history, Glyn Millington, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history, Haines Brown, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Allan Streib, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Bob Proulx, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Rusi, 2014/05/30
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/30
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/30
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/30
- Message not available
- From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Barry Margolin, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Sharon Kimble, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29