[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
Rusi |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 26 May 2014 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Monday, May 26, 2014 9:11:56 AM UTC+5:30, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Use comp.text.tex or http://tex.stackexchange.com/ and you'll learn much
> more quickly (and with much less frustration).
Thanks -- looks like sound advice!
Ive been struggling with xetex for a few days without much progress.
Is there a mailing list equivalent of comp.text.tex?
And/or does googlegroups work?
[My experience is that many usenet lists dont allow google groups posts until
there is a separate mailing list membership]
Re: RTF for emacs, Hans BKK, 2014/05/21
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/23
- Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs,
Rusi <=
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/26
Message not availableRe: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
Message not availableRe: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/25
Message not availableRe: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
Re: editor and word processor history, Glyn Millington, 2014/05/29
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/29
Message not availableRe: editor and word processor history, Haines Brown, 2014/05/29
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Allan Streib, 2014/05/29