[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving in js
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: moving in js |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:20:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Am 09.08.2012 17:04, schrieb João Távora:
also seen from usage, that command should never fail, unless beginning or
end of buffers are reached.
I don't understand this part. Why should it not fail?
Well, that's a matter of taste maybe. IMO expression have the part of words in
natural language.
Not exactly, as common words don't nest, but similar. Will you ever get an error from
"forward-word" unless at the EOB?
In your opinion,
what is backward-sexp suppose to do on its second invocation in a lisp-mode
buffer containing
(foo (bar baz) quux)
with the cursor in the innermost list between "bar" and "baz"??
it would reach the beginning of the innermost list, "(bar"
a second invocation would reach "foo"
- moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/07
- Re: moving in js, Peter Dyballa, 2012/08/07
- Re: moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/08
- Re: moving in js, João Távora, 2012/08/08
- Re: moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/09
- Message not available
- Re: moving in js,
Andreas Röhler <=
- Message not available
- Re: moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/09
- Re: moving in js, João Távora, 2012/08/09
- Re: moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/10
- Message not available
- Re: moving in js, Andreas Röhler, 2012/08/10