|
From: | Rainer M Krug |
Subject: | Re: Probelm starting emacs snapshot - "Font `lucidasanstypewriter-10' is not defined" |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:49:11 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20/06/12 11:22, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Am 20.06.2012 um 10:09 schrieb Rainer M Krug: > >> Some more info: > > Is fc-list listing this font with exactly the same name? Could be you're > mixing XLFD names > (lucidasanstypewriter) and libfontconfig names (-10). fc-list | grep lucida does not yield anything. locate lucida /home/rkrug/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/context/fonts/lucida-math.lfg also only the LaTeX font. My question is: why does emacs-snapshot need lucida, and emacs 23 not? Or did it just ignore the missing font? And: How can I install the font on Ubuntu Precise? Rainer > > I am using a complicated "-fn 'Lucida Sans > Typewriter:autohint=true:antialias=true:size=9'" > with Mac OS X... > > -- Mit friedvollen Grüßen > > Pete > > Kommt eine Termite in die Bar und fragt: „Ist der Bartender da?“ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/hnJcACgkQoYgNqgF2egqKSwCeL6ZWB+4itpY7HcHvUdBMoA0U vsUAn3kblDIwM/I4sWuBEQ+BfUnREDVB =FrmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |