[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: random predicate function
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: random predicate function |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:44:15 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:20:05 +0100 "Pascal J. Bourguignon"
<pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
PJB> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> I agree the CL macros are nicer, but the non-macro version is much
>> easier to debug *in GNU Emacs* and it's already installed. So they both
>> have benefits.
PJB> I don't see how code without macros is easier to debug, there are so
PJB> many macros in lisp code.
We're talking about GNU Emacs specifically. Have you debugged macros
there? They are definitely not as intuitive as functions in the debugger.
>> Can your `shuffle' be part of cl-extra.el in Emacs? I like the brevity
>> of it, and it's a good example of how to use `loop' properly.
PJB> shuffle is not a Common Lisp function, so it should not be added to
PJB> cl-extra, but it could be included in an emacs lisp library.
OK, thanks.
Ted
- Re: random predicate function, (continued)
Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/13
Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/13
- Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: random predicate function, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/15
- Re: random predicate function, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
RE: random predicate function, Drew Adams, 2010/12/15