[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: condition-case
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: condition-case |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:29:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Elena <egarrulo@gmail.com> writes:
> On Dec 8, 3:56 am, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com>
> wrote:
>> Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:43:29 -0500 Stefan Monnier
>> > <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >>> I mean *today* why shouldn't `handler-case' be part of Emacs? Is there
>> >>> anything blocking its inclusion in cl.el?
>>
>> > SM> I can't remember hearing of even a rumor of a patch to implement it.
>> > SM> So, I guess that's the reason.
>>
>> > OK. So, given the source code Pascal posted, and assuming he assigns
>> > the copyright, we could bring that into cl.el, right? Or will that not
>> > work?
>>
>> There's no objection to assigning copyright to the FSF, I already did
>> that for some other code.
>
> Thank you Pascal. Are you/we talking about just "handler-case" or the
> whole "pjb-cl.el"?
Whatever is wanted. Some of the stuff in pjb-cl is ill-defined.
Actually, before trying to make emacs lisp more like Common Lisp by
adding functions and methods, what would we really need to add to emacs
lisp are packages and reader macros.
Once these two things are added to emacs lisp, it will become much
easier to integrate another language such a Common Lisp or scheme in
emacs lisp.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- Re: condition-case, (continued)
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/16
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Elena, 2010/12/09
- Re: condition-case,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=