[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: too many buffers
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: too many buffers |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:40:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Elena <egarrulo@gmail.com> writes:
> Remedial plug-ins do exists which will make your editing experience
> wickedly fast (I myself use ViEmu + Visual Assist X). You shouldn't
> be comparing a vanilla Visual Studio to a customized Emacs, either.
> It wouldn't be fair.
Indeed. Emacs has remediaal plug-ins too. A lot of them.
You could compare: emacs -Q
with vanilla Visual Studio (but then I would argue that emacs -Q IS a
bare EDITOR).
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
- too many buffers, Jack Hokus, 2010/12/09
- Re: too many buffers, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Tim X, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Miles Bader, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08