[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tramp question
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Tramp question |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:32:35 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Well maybe since "shell-command-to-string" is used non interactively it
>> doesn't make sense for it to be so smart, since I should know what I'm
>> doing.
>> Might it be this the reason of this difference?
> No, I don't believe that's the reason.
> Anyway, I've checked the Emacs tree, and there are several dozen places
> where `shell-command-to-string' is called. I fear we cannot simply
> redefine its behaviour.
FWIW, shell-command obeys file-name-handlers-alist (but uses
call-process rather than process-file). So it looks like this area
needs a clean up.
Stefan
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Tramp question,
Stefan Monnier <=