[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cperl-mode - how people outline their code?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: cperl-mode - how people outline their code? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:16:49 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Ilya Zakharevich
<nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> wrote:
IZ> On 2010-04-23, LanX <lanx.perl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> more folding on =pods would be nice, too.
IZ> Right now I have no idea what this might mean: essentially, we have an
IZ> "interleaved" file with two different "channels": code, and POD. Each
IZ> one of them has its notion of "outline level", so if they were
IZ> separate, one could outline them without much problem.
IZ> Now how would these two different outline semantics be reflected on
IZ> the "interleaved" file? Would one want to have two different "active"
IZ> levels, one for POD, another for code?
I would do outline levels on POD and also set up the next-error
framework to move back and forth between functions.
I used to use folding-mode in Perl but it's really dangerous to hide
code in my experience. So I would only ever hide POD.
Ted
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: cperl-mode - how people outline their code?,
Ted Zlatanov <=