[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:05:16 +0200 |
Am 11.08.2008 um 13:38 schrieb Jonathan Groll:
Question is, which one is best for coding?
Bigger question is: what do you mean with "coding?"
For coding, i.e., writing code to be compiled, interpreted, or
executed, you don't need a shell. Even vi could be OK for this
purpose ...
--
Greetings
Pete
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so.
- Optimal emacs shell for coding, Jonathan Groll, 2008/08/11
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Xah, 2008/08/11
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/11
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Xah, 2008/08/11
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/11
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Tim X, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12