[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Daniel Pittman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:16:51 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
On 28 Nov 2004, Maciek Pasternacki wrote:
> On Sweetmorn, The Aftermath 39, 3170 YOLD, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
>
>>>>> Also, I don't like screen(1) eating my C-a which I use frequently to
>>>>> jump to beginning of line in shell. After thinking about other
>>>>> binding to use, I realised that I use virtually every binding (since
>>>>> I learned Emacs I use the same bindings in shell).
>>>>
>>>> I use ` for screen, `` inserts a single ` character. Works quite well.
>>>
>>> ...except when you try to paste a shell script from
>>> editor/browser/whatever. Before I had ScreenTerm and could safely
>>> disable hotkey I also used backtick but strange things happening when
>>> pasting textwere annoying.
>>
>> Yeah. A friend uses C-o, perhaps that's better. In a shell, you
>> don't use C-o that often, and for the few times, C-o o is good enough,
>> I think.
To duck in here briefly, after *long* consideration, I ended up with my
screen(1) control key on 'C-]', with 'C-] C-]' generating the actual
sequence.
The logic: I don't use `abort-recursive-edit' very often at all, and
the only other common tool using that key sequence at all is telnet(1).
Daniel
--
Men become civilized, not in proportion to their willingness to believe, but
in proportion to their readiness to doubt.
-- H. L. Mencken
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/26
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Daniel Pittman <=
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Mike, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/25