[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:00:01 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> keywords, especially for SQL) or some kind of electric space for Lisp
>> For Lisp I'd recommend to use lowercase. It's more legible.
> Code in tutorials and code printed by Lisp printer has uppercase
> symbols. It's more natural for me to write lowercase but I found
> a convention to write symbols that come from Common Lisp (i.e. not
> defined by me) in uppercase.
It was done in the past. Nowadays, Common Lisp code uses lowercase mostly.
> It seems to be logical but OTOH I'm a Lisp newbie;
Allcaps only makes sense when you don't have a choice: it's much more
difficult to read (your brain has a lot more trouble making out the words).
Stefan
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Leonardo Boiko, 2004/11/24
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Mathias Dahl, 2004/11/25
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Lee Sau Dan, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/28
- Re: emacs for everything?, ken, 2004/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/24
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Micha Feigin, 2004/11/28
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/28