[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:29:13 -0600 |
> Do you meant StumpWM?
> It's eventually going to be a common lisp successor to ratpoison; not
> as featureful yet, but still pretty cool.
What do you mean? ratpoison doesn't _have_ features. That's what makes
it so useable. ;-)
What you will read here may shock you.
http://ratpoison.elektrubadur.se/Features
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/21
Message not availableRe: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/26
Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27