[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject Namimg Convention anyone?
From: |
Mark Elston |
Subject: |
Re: Subject Namimg Convention anyone? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 19:27:57 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Xnews/5.03.24 |
Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com> wrote in news:409FB039.6060301
@yahoo.com:
> Mark Elston wrote:
> > OK. I'm starting to get annoyed with the SPAM starting to show up in
> > this newsgroup. Since this is an unmoderated group could we all agree
> > to use a naming convention for posting to allow us to easily weed out
> > the wheat from the chaff?
> > ...
>
> There is already a convention:
>
> Subject: foo.el
> Subject: foo.el 1.2
> Subject: foo.el 1.2 --- Frobnicate oedipal ouvre, with font-lock support
>
OK. Yeah, I knew that but I was really looking for something a little
more amenable to automation. I suppose this is easy enough to recognize
by sight but is a little harder to describe in a filter file (I use XNews).
Sorry for the original rant but when more than 50% of the messages in the
newsgroup are spam I get a little testy.
Mark