[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded |
Date: |
06 May 2004 08:30:00 +0200 |
> From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
> Date: 06 May 2004 00:56:50 +0900
>
> For many of us, emacs is what's familiar, and we'd like to use it even
> when it's not optimal... :-/
I doubt that ``many of us'' are familiar only with one tool. Or
should be, anyway.
I'm not saying I'm against pushing the limit up, but I don't expect
from an interactive editor to be able to edit 200MB files without
problems. So I simply don't think about it as the tool of choice in
such cases.
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Marco Gidde, 2004/05/05
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/05
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Marco Gidde, 2004/05/05
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/06
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Marco Gidde, 2004/05/06
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/05/06
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/05
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2004/05/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, upro, 2004/05/05
Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Matthieu Moy, 2004/05/05
Re: Maximum buffer size exceeded, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/05