[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:44:59 -0600 |
> I don't see why a markup language, or any programming language, ought
> to "be on a par" with Emacs Lisp within Emacs itself.
OK, maybe not quite on a par -- how about the level of Jack (assuming
that ELisp and Emacs C collectively make up QKA)? After all, TeX is
is the GNU text formatter (this is according to the Manifesto, though
the prase "the GNU text formatter" is not perhaps 100% kosher) and
Emacs is the GNU text editor (again, I'm not necessarily being
perfectly precise).
Seems like they should go together hand in hand... or more like, hand
in glove -- since they already do go together hand in hand. Maybe I'm
thinking about how to acheive my goals here in the wrong way -- it
wouldn't be the first time. Nevertheless, I am finding in my work
that the boundaries between TeX and Lisp have blurred -- and I'm
liking it, I would like it if they blurred more.
- emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Joe Corneli, 2003/12/22
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/22
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Jesper Harder, 2003/12/22
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Joe Corneli, 2003/12/22
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Jesper Harder, 2003/12/22
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Joe Corneli, 2003/12/23
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/12/23
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX,
Joe Corneli <=
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/25
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Joe Corneli, 2003/12/25
- Re: emacs documentation for (La)TeX, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/25